5/2/12

When reading about Darwin it is said that men are superior to woman but woman could be trained to think and act more like men. This concept baffles me because what I get out of this thinking is that it is thought that it is only necessary to keep women around to have children. I question if it was wrong to act like a woman in Darwin's eyes or to just be a woman in general? I know that some men like woman that are more masculine, but how are men suppose to be attracted to woman that are constantly acting like men? Also I question if Darwin would think that woman would be subject to natural selection if it wasn't for the fact that they are needed to bare the children and that by acting like a man they are more fit to survive? I might be looking into this a little to far but the way that woman were viewed during that time blows my mind; how do you think that women could be trained like animals to act a different way?